24 05 2005

The Mayor (Councillor Burgess)(ex-officio) (P), Chairman of Policy and Organisation Board (Councillor Hook)(ex-officio), Councillors Allen(P), Carr(P), Champion(P), Clinton(P), Davis(P), Farr(P), Foster,  Smith(P), Taylor(P) and Train(P).

 

 

It was reported that, in accordance with Standing Orders, Councillor Hayward had been nominated to replace Councillor Foster for this meeting.

 

 

 

 

Apologies for inability to attend the meeting were received from Councillors Foster and Hook.

 

 

 

 

Councillor Hayward declared an interest in Agenda Item 7/02 (K1742/3 – 31 Anglesey Road Gosport); Councillor Smith declared an interest in Agenda Item 7/14 (K11886/15 – Huhtamaki Van Leer, Grange Road, Gosport); Councillor Farr declared an interest in Agenda Item 7/15 (K16904 – Forton Recreation Ground, Forton Road, Gosport).

 

 

 

 

RESOLVED:  That the Minutes of the Regulatory Board meeting held on 12 April 2005 and 19 May 2005 be approved and signed by the Chairman as a true and correct record.

 

 

 

 

It was reported that deputations had been received on planning applications K1742/3 and K16877.

 

 

 

 

No public questions had been received.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consideration was given to a report of the Regulatory Services Manager (a copy of which is attached in the Minute Book as Appendix ‘A’).  The purpose of the report was to set out the background to the Best Value Performance Indicators relating to speed of determining planning and other applications; performance against government and local targets in relation to applications; and performance in resolving complaints relating to possible breaches of planning control.

 

Members congratulated Officers on their very good performance figures for this quarter.

 

 

RESOLVED: That Development Control performance 01.01.05 – 31.03.05 be noted by the Board.

 

 

 

 

The Regulatory Services Manager submitted a report on applications received for planning consent setting out the recommendation in each case (a copy of which is attached in the Minute Book as Appendix ‘B’).

 

 

RESOLVED:  That the decisions be taken on each application for planning consent as detailed below:

 

 

 

HMS Daedalus  Lee-on-the-Solent  Hampshire     

 

 

The officer reported that five further letters of objection had been received and also a further letter of amplification dated 11 May 2005 regarding the use of Police spotter planes and the Gliding Club.

 

 

In answer to questions from Members, the officer confirmed that the agent’s letter of 5 May 2005 provides clarification of the proposal in terms of no increase in the existing flying activities and, as indicated in the report, no further noise assessment was required. 

 

 

It was confirmed that although the proposed development was within a strategic gap there was no conflict with the terms of the Local Plan Review as this would be an essential operational requirement under Policy R/OS1.

 

 

In answer to a Member’s question, the officer confirmed that the future use of the site by the Gliding Club was still under review by the Ministry of Defence.  Both the Police and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency had experienced a conflict of use with the Gliding Club and some near misses had been reported.  The officer also confirmed that the use of the site by the Gliding Club was not a planning issue.

 

 

RESOLVED: That no objection be raised for the following reason:-

 

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed is acceptable in terms of its setting outside of the Urban Area Boundary and effect on the surrounding residential area and as such complies with Policies BE1, CY3 and MOD1 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/OS1, R/ENV6 and R/MOD1 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

31 Anglesey Road  Gosport  Hampshire  PO12 2EG   

 

 

Note: Councillor Hayward declared a personal interest in this item, left the room and took no part in the discussion or voting thereon.

 

 

In accordance with Standing Orders, Mr Wardle was permitted to address the Board on behalf of the objectors.  He expressed concern that the siting of Plot 1 was four metres forward from the current dwelling; the proposed design and building materials to be used were not compatible with the surrounding properties; a number of windows in the proposed properties would overlook both his own property and those of neighbours; part of the existing hedge was dying; the demolition of the existing building and the construction works would result in dust and noise in the area and an increase in traffic from construction vehicles that would impact on a nearby school crossing;  Mr Wardle asked that the windows that would overlook neighbouring properties be not only obscured glazed but also fixed shut.  He also requested the construction of a two metre high wall to increase privacy to his garden patio area.

 

 

In answer to a Member’s question, Mr Wardle confirmed that the report did address some of his concerns over the materials to be used in the construction of the new buildings.

 

 

Mr Cooper, the applicant, then addressed the Board.  He confirmed that a professional demolition contractor would be used to demolish the existing building, so minimising noise and dust as far as possible. It was estimated that the work would take no more than 2 working weeks.  The parking and traffic issues had been addressed to the satisfaction of the Highways Department and there was sufficient parking space within the property boundary so as not to necessitate on road parking.  The windows overlooking other properties would be glazed with obscure glass but would not be fixed shut.  However, he would consider the use of small opening upper fanlights to minimise loss of privacy.  Mr Cooper confirmed that the construction of a boundary wall would damage existing trees and therefore the construction of a fence was proposed, the exact design to be agreed with the Planning Department.  The hedge and fence would prevent ground floor windows of the new properties overlooking surrounding properties.

 

In answer to a Member’s question, the officer confirmed that there was no definitive building line in this area as all the properties were individual.  The proposed development would come forward from the existing property but there would still be open space in front of the buildings and the boundary wall would not be altered. 

 

 

Members welcomed the fact that the preservation of trees was being taken into consideration within this development and the officer drew Members’ attention to Condition 8 on page 11 of the report.

 

 

RESOLVED:  That planning application K1742/3 – 31 Anglesey Road  Gosport be approved subject to Section 106 agreement relating to the payment of a commuted sum towards the provision and/or improvement of outdoor playing space and subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager, for the following reasons:

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed, by reason of its location, design and orientation, would not have a detrimental impact on the character or appearance of the area, or the setting of the adjacent Conservation Area, or adjoining or prospective occupiers, or traffic conditions in the locality.  As such, the proposal complies with Policies BE1, BE6, H5, T5, T6 and RL10 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and R/DP1, R/DP8, R/H4, R/T10, R/T11 and R/OS7 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

 

 

In accordance with Standing Orders, Mr Burn was permitted to address the Board on behalf of the objectors.  He explained that he was a part owner, with his mother, of the property 16 Grove Road.  He considered that the proposed two-storey building was inappropriate in this location as the buildings on either side were chalet bungalows.  As the plot was long and narrow, the resulting long, two-storey building would block sunshine and light from two doors and three windows in No 16.  He expressed the wish that, whilst he would prefer to see no building at all, if development was approved that it be for a chalet bungalow and not a two-storey house.

 

 

Mr Ashworth, of Fairplay Residential Properties Ltd, had no further comment to make on behalf of the developers.

 

 

The officer confirmed that this application was for outline consent only and therefore no details of the height and style of the building were to be considered at this time.  Properties in Grove Road were a mix of styles dating from the 1920s to the present day.  A site inspection had shown that there was a carport and garage belonging to No 16 Grove Road between that property and the proposed new development and the distance between the two properties was acceptable within the parameters of the Local Plan.  Further consideration would be given to the proposed development when detailed plans were submitted.

 

 

RESOLVED:  That planning application K16877 18 Grove Road  Lee-on-the-Solent be approved, subject to Section 106 agreement relating to the payment of a commuted sum towards the provision and/or improvement of outdoor playing space and subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager, for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed by reason of its design, siting and orientation, will not have a detrimental impact on the neighbouring properties or street scene.  As such, the proposal complies with Policies BE1, H5, T6 and RL10 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and R/DP1, R/OS7 and R/T11 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

4 - 6 Brockhurst Road  Gosport  Hampshire     

 

 

In answer to a Member’s question, the officer confirmed that the development would have one vehicular access to the site, 4 metres further west than the access approved in the previous planning permission granted in May 2004 under reference K16417/1.

 

Councillor Farr wished it to be recorded that he voted against the recommendation.

 

RESOLVED:  That planning application K16417/2 4-6 Brockhurst Road  Gosport be approved, subject to Section 106 agreement relating to the payment of a commuted sum towards the provision and/or improvement of outdoor playing space and subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager, for the following reasons:

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the proposal would not be significantly harmful to the character or visual amenities of the area, the amenities of existing or prospective occupiers, or traffic/parking conditions in the locality. As such, the development complies with Policies BE1, BE2, H5, T6 and RL10 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/DP6, R/OS7, R/T3, R/T10, R/T11 and R/ENV5 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

 

RESOLVED:  That planning application K13101/3 – 35 Vale Grove Gosport be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed is acceptable in this location because it is of an appropriate design and will not have a significant detrimental impact on the amenities of adjoining residents. As such it complies with Policies BE1 and BE3 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1 and R/DP7 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

St George Barracks (South)  Mumby Road  Gosport  Hampshire   

 

 

RESOLVED:  That planning application K15660/22 – St George Barracks (South) Mumby Road  Gosport be approved, subject to Section 106 agreement relating to the payment of a commuted sum towards the provision and/or improvement of outdoor playing space and provision of affordable housing and subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager, for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the proposal would have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and would not have an adverse effect on either the character or visual amenities of the area, or the setting of the adjacent Listed Buildings.  The scheme would not be significantly harmful to the amenities of existing or prospective occupiers, or traffic/parking conditions in the locality and makes satisfactory provision for outdoor playing space and affordable housing. As such, the development complies with Policies BE1, BE2, BE9, BE11, BE12, BE15, H5, H7, T6 and RL10 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/DP3, R/DP4, R/BH1, R/BH3, R/BH7, R/H4, R/H5, R/OS7, R/ENV5, R/T11 and R/DP6 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

 

The officer informed the Board that 2 letters of amplification dated the 14 and 15 May and Plans dated 16 and 18 May had been received.  The six letters of objection noted in the report had all cited the height of the building above the level of the road as being the grounds for objection.  The new plans indicated that the building would be of a comparable height to the existing building and would not exceed the level of the road. 

 

The officer also informed the Board that there was an error in the report and that Condition 3, referring to vehicle turning space, was incorrect as there was no vehicular access to the site.  The Condition should have referred to cycle storage and a correct schedule of Conditions was circulated to Board Members (a copy of which is attached in the Minute Book as Appendix ‘C’).

 

Members welcomed the proposed improved facilities outlined in this application.

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K16900 – Site of Former Café/Restaurant  Marine Parade West  Lee-on-the-Solent be approved subject to the revised schedule of conditions to the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed, by reason of its siting, design and orientation, would not have a detrimental impact on the nearby residential properties or the visual amenities of the area.  As such, the proposal complies with Policies BE1, BE2, CH1, T6, RL2 and RL5  of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and R/DP1, R/DP6, R/CH1, R/T11, R/OS3 and R/OS9  of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

137 Privett Road  Gosport  Hampshire  PO12 3SP   

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K5658/8 – 137 Privett Road  Gosport be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed is acceptable in this location in terms of its scale and design and will not have any detrimental impact on the amenities of adjoining and prospective residents or parking provision and highway safety. As such the proposal complies with Policies BE1, H5, T6, T8 and RL10 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/T2, R/T10, R/T11, R/OS7 and R/OS12 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

5-8A Oaklands Office Park  Aerodrome Road  Gosport  Hampshire  PO13 0GY 

 

 

This application was withdrawn prior to the meeting.

 

 

 

152 Elson Road  Gosport  Hampshire  PO12 4AA   

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K12725/3 – 152 Elson Road  Gosport be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, it is considered that the proposal would not be harmful to the retail function of the shopping centre, the amenities of adjacent residential properties, nor parking provision in the locality and, as such, complies with Policies BE1, S3, S4 and T6 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/S4 and R/T11 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

32 Solent Way  Gosport  Hampshire  PO12 2NS   

 

 

The officer confirmed that this application was before the Board as the applicant was a member of staff from Gosport Borough Council.

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application KK2113/4 – 32 Solent Way  Gosport be approved for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That the felling of this dead tree without the requirement to replace it will not have a detrimental impact on the appearance of the area due to the height of the existing trees within the locality and limited space to the front of the property. As such the proposal accords with Policy BE6 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policy R/DP8 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

Priddys Hard Heritage Site  Priddys Hard  Heritage Way  Gosport  Hampshire 

 

 

RESOLVED: That listed building consent application K16770/3 – Priddys Hard Heritage Site  Priddys Hard  Heritage Way  Gosport be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, as the temporary store will be completely screened from the north, south and west by the existing Listed Buildings and not physically attached to them and will only be glimpsed from a distance through the slats in the fence on the east side of the compound, provided it is painted in an appropriate colour finish and retained for a temporary period it will have a neutral impact on the Conservation Area and will not be detrimental to the character, appearance and setting of the Listed Buildings.  As such the development complies with Policies BE9 and BE11 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and R/BH1 and R/BH3 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

Priddys Hard Heritage  Site  Priddys Hard  Heritage Way  Gosport  Hampshire 

 

 

RESOLVED: That temporary consent application K16770/2 – Priddys Hard Heritage Site Priddys Hard  Heritage Way  Gosport be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, as the temporary store will be completely screened from the north, south and west by the existing Listed Buildings and not physically attached to them and will only be glimpsed from a distance through the slats in the fence on the east side of the compound, provided it is painted in an appropriate colour finish and retained for a temporary period it will have a neutral impact on the Conservation Area and will not be detrimental to the character, appearance and setting of the Listed Buildings.  As such the development complies with Policies BE9 and BE11 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and R/BH1 and R/BH3 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

Huhtamaki Van Leer  Grange Road  Gosport  Hampshire   

 

 

Note: Councillor Smith declared a personal interest in this item, left the room and took no part in the discussion or voting thereon.

 

 

RESOLVED: That temporary consent application K11886/15 – Huhtamaki Van Leer  Grange Road Gosport be approved subject to the condition set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

That having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the continued siting of the portacabin is acceptable in this location, it is not detrimental to the visual amenities of the area and as such complies with Policy BE1 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1 and R/EMP3 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

Forton Recreation Ground  Forton Road  Gosport  Hampshire   

 

 

Note: Councillor Farr declared a personal interest in this item, left the room and took no part in the discussion or voting thereon.

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K16904 – Forton Recreation Ground  Forton Road Gosport be approved subject to the condition set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed is acceptable in terms of siting, design and its effect on visual amenity and neighbouring residents in this location and as such complies with Policy BE1 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1 and R/ENV7 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

HMS Daedalus  Lee-On-The-Solent  Hampshire     

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K15857/3 – HMS Daedalus  Lee-on-the-Solent be approved subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the development as proposed is acceptable in terms of siting, design and its effect on visual amenity in this location and as such complies with Policy BE1 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1 and R/ENV4 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

Walpole Park  South Street  Gosport  Hampshire   

 

 

RESOLVED: That planning application K16903 – Walpole Park  South Street Gosport be approved subject to the condition set out in the report of the Regulatory Services Manager for the following reasons:

 

 

i

Having regard to the provisions of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and all other material considerations, the proposed vehicle crossings will not harm to the character or visual amenities of the area and will improve traffic conditions in the locality. As such, the development complies with Policies BE1 and T7 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan and Policies R/DP1, R/T10 and R/T11 of the Gosport Borough Local Plan Review.

 

 

 

 

There were none.